Blasphemy, Assassination, and the Pakistani Diaspora in the UK – The Pale Red Line

European Eye on Radicalization

Drawing Lines

The United Kingdom has frank official words for foreign hate preachers. They are not welcome and the government will exclude the worst from its shores.

Prime Minister David Cameron made this very clear in his landmark speech on extremism at a security conference in Munich in 2011:

Whether they are violent in their means or not, we must make it impossible for the extremists to succeed.  Now, for governments, there are some obvious ways we can do this.  We must ban preachers of hate from coming to our countries.

Being famous provides no mantle of protection. Memorably, the prominent Islamist preacher Yusuf al-Qaradawi was banned from the UK in 2008.

Nor are undesirables on the right wing welcome, even if they hail from powerful America, long the country’s closest ally. For example, the controversial blogger Pamela Geller and Robert Spencer, the man behind the “Jihad Watch” website, were banned in 2013.

In short, solid red lines have been promised for many years and often enough they have indeed been drawn. When supporters of banned extremists react with fury, shouting about “Islamophobia” or “double standards”, the lines are held with resolution, including in the courts if legal challenges are mounted. Is all as well as can be on this front in the UK, then?

UK Rhetoric and Pakistani Preachers

In a word, no. Some lines are very pale, at best. This can be seen in the case of some Pakistani Sufi preachers who are frequent visitors, conducting tours that draw big crowds and substantial donations for their operations in Pakistan.

As Rashad Ali has noted for European Eye on Radicalization, Pakistan is embroiled in an angry controversy about punishing “blasphemy”, where preachers seek to outdo each other in a “twisted theological race to the bottom”.

Many of these preachers are strong supporters of Mumtaz Qadri, the man who assassinated the Pakistani politician Salman Taseer in 2011 because Taseer challenged Pakistan’s blasphemy laws and stood up for Asia Bibi, a Christian Pakistani sentenced to death for blasphemy. For this, some preachers hold, Taseer undoubtedly deserved death. And so does Asia Bibi, for that matter, even though Pakistan’s Supreme Court acquitted her in November 2018.

Demonstrators in Pakistan demanding the execution of Asia Bibi

Preachers in this camp also tend to subject Ahmadi Muslims to angry denigration, insisting that they are not Muslims and are a threat to the true faith.  This is why the UK is home to a sizeable Ahmadi community – its members fled hatred and persecution in Pakistan.

One might think such views would prompt the UK to exclude these preachers. After all, in 2016 the UK lost one of its own MPs, Jo Cox, to a far right assassin in a national calamity that shocked the country. It has also seen anti-Ahmadi violence – in 2016 the Glasgow Ahmadi Muslim shopkeeper Asad Shah was murdered by Tanveer Ahmed, a fanatic from Bradford who idolized Mumtaz Qadri and saw Asad Shah as an enemy of Allah.

Furthermore, the government has insisted that it does and will take action in this field. In 2016, James Brokenshire MP, then the Home Office security minister, was probed by the Labour MP Siobhain McDonagh, who has campaigned passionately for Ahmadi Muslims in her south London constituency. Brokensire responded with these words:

“I, for one, stand up and defend the right of members of that community to profess and practise their faith without fear of intimidation or violence.”

Indeed, he added:

“I want to reassure her about the importance that we attach to the issue and the steps that we have taken to prevent preachers of hate from coming into this country.”

This means visa action:

“It is of paramount importance that immigration processes ensure that individuals who have come to notice as a threat to the UK’s security and society, or who may present such a threat, are prevented from coming here to spread their messages and incite violence.”

In addition, Sara Khan, the Lead Commissioner for Countering Extremism, spoke up for Asia Bibi in November 2018:

“I am calling on the Government to offer asylum to Asia Bibi. Despite the verdict of Pakistan’s Supreme Court, Asia Bibi’s life remains in grave danger at the hands of religious extremists.”

For Khan, this story is clearly part of the UK’s fight with extremists:

“Countering extremism means standing for human rights, religious freedom and equality, and standing firm against extremists who seek to do away with these fundamental rights and freedoms. This is an opportunity to send a clear message to extremists that our country will stand up for our values.”

Rhetoric versus Reality in Luton 

Let’s go back to the lines, this time in Luton, a town outside London with a troubled history of Islamist and far right extremism. One of its mosques, the Jamia Islamia Ghousia Trust, is part of the problem. For years, it has hosted aggressive Pakistani preachers who support killing the blasphemous for Allah. They include Hanif Qureshi, an especially fiery preacher who allegedly inspired Mumtaz Qadri to murder Salman Taseer.

The mosque has also openly backed Khatme Nubuwwat, a movement dedicated to hatred of Ahmadi Muslims.

Yet the mosque is not under pressure. It has instead been feted in the local community and even received significant local authority public sector funding.

Nor has it changed its ways. On 20 November, it gave prominent billing to the Pakistani preacher Hamid Saeed Kazmi at a conference at the mosque.

Kazmi can be seen on Facebook in a video filmed in November 2018 taking Pakistan’s Supreme Court to task for acquitting Asia Bibi, hinting absurdly at foreign conspiracies, and promising unyielding opposition:

“But what we cannot accept is how the Supreme Court dismissed the case against her on technical grounds. Obviously we cannot compromise on any slights made against the prophet. If we accept this then it renders pointless all our other protests associated with this issue, for example the protests against the US and Danish cartoons and so on. If the Supreme Court does not reconsider its judgement then there will be issues related to potential foreign involvement and fabrications of accounts that will come up since our demands are very legitimate. We are going to exercise our right to legal recourse in terms of a review petition since this is a case of ghairat-e-emaani (the dignity or integrity of faith) on which there cannot be any question nor compromise.”

In another video on Facebook, Kazmi stands up for the assassin Mumtaz Qadri, saying he “did a service for the whole of the ummah (community of believers)”. Actually, Qadri is “to be celebrated and respected and given due honor” for his deed.

Pakistan executed Qadri for his crime in 2016. Kazmi’s response was to attend Qadri’s funeral, as reported by the Pakistani newspaper Dawn:

“The government protected terrorists and delayed their cases for several years despite the fact they killed hundreds of people but it executed Qadri in haste,” said Syed Hamid Saeed Kazmi, a former federal minister for religious affairs in ex-prime minister Syed Yousuf Raza Gilani’s cabinet, while talking to Dawn.

Mr Kazmi, who arrived in the city to attend the funeral prayers, said Mumtaz Qadri killed the former governor out of his love for the holy prophet (peace be upon him). He said the huge gathering at the funeral was enough to prove that people considered Mumtaz Qadri as a martyr.”

Hamid Saeed Kazmi speaking at the Jamia Islamia Ghousia mosque in November 2018

Muhammad Iqbal Chishti was another Pakistani preacher at the Luton conference. He appears to be in the same camp. In the aftermath of the murder of Salman Taseer, he signed a statement with other religious leaders which asked people “not to express regrets or sympathies over his assassination”.

When Mumtaz Qadri was sentenced to death in 2011, Chishti attended a conference where “various Barelvi clerics demanded the release of Malik Mumtaz Hussain Qadri, whom they described as “Ghazi” – someone who fights an Islamic war.”

Another speaker given top billing at the Luton conference was Abdul Qadir Jilani, a prominent religious leader in Walthamstow, a town on the periphery of London. He too is a Mumtaz Qadri supporter and his mosque has a poor record.

Abdul Qadir Jilani supporting Mumtaz Qadri

None of this seems to be of concern to local police officers. In fact, one of them appears in the Luton mosque’s photographs of the November event, seemingly happy to take part in the proceedings.

A police officer at the Luton conference in November 2018

Nor have commanders been apprehensive, it seems. This picture shows Bernard Hogan-Howe, then the top man in London’s Metropolitan Police, receiving flowers from Abdul Aziz Chishti, the leader of the Jamia Islamia Ghousia mosque.

British Ahmadi Muslims in particular and liberal and secularist British Muslims in general look upon scenes like this and despair. No one cares about them, they sometimes feel, while their nemeses have carved out strong social positions.

If it is to be true to its official words and send a powerful message, Britain would do well to attend to the palest of its supposedly deep red border lines.

Read original article HERE.



We are using cookies to give you the best experience. You can find out more about which cookies we are using or switch them off in privacy settings.
AcceptPrivacy Settings


This Cookie Policy explains how Ahmadiyya Muslim Association UK (AMA UK)  Limited (“company”, “we”, “us”, and “ours”) use cookies and similar technologies to recognize you when you visit our websites, including without limitation and its mobile or localized versions and related domains / sub-domains (“Websites”) and/or our mobile application (“App”). It explains what these technologies are and why we use them, as well as your rights to control our use of them.

What are cookies?

Cookies are text files containing small amounts of information which are downloaded to your computer or mobile device when you visit a website or mobile application. Cookies are then sent back to the originating site on each subsequent visit, or to another site that recognizes that cookies. You can find out more information about cookies at

Cookies are widely used in order to make sites work or to work more efficiently.

We use cookies to enhance the online experience of our visitors (for example, by remembering your visits and/or page preferences) and to better understand how our site is used. Cookies may tell us, for example, whether you have visited our site before or whether you are a new visitor.

Cookies can remain on your computer or mobile device for different periods of time. Some cookies are ‘session cookies’, meaning that they exist only while your browser is open. These are deleted automatically once you close your browser. Other cookies are ‘permanent cookies,’ meaning that they survive after your browser is closed. They can be used by the site to recognize your computer or mobile device when you open your browser and browse the Internet again.

Why do we use cookies?

We use cookies for several reasons. Some cookies are required for technical reasons in order for our Websites and/or App to operate, and we refer to these as “essential” or “strictly necessary” cookies. Other cookies also enable us to track and target the interests of our users to enhance the experience on our Websites and/or App. Third parties serve cookies through our Websites and/or App for analytics and other purposes such as Google Analytics. In particular, we use forms related cookies which when you submit data through a form such as those found on contact pages or comment forms cookies may be set to remember your user details for future correspondence.

How can you control cookies?

You have the right to choose whether or not to accept cookies and we have explained how you can exercise this right below. However, please note that if you do not accept our cookies, you may experience some inconvenience in your use of our site.

You can set or amend your web browser controls to accept or refuse cookies. As the means by which you can refuse cookies through your web browser controls vary from browser-to-browser, you should visit your browser’s help menu for more information.

How often will we update this Cookie Policy?

We may update this Cookie Policy from time to time in order to reflect, for example, changes to the cookies we use or for other operational, legal or regulatory reasons. Please, therefore, re-visit this Cookie Policy regularly to stay informed about our use of cookies and related technologies.