Minority issue: Cameras forced off Ahmadi worship centre

RAWALPINDI: The Ahmadi community in Rawalpindi went through another harrowing day on Friday, when hundreds of locals assembled outside their place of worship demanding the removal of barricades and closed-circuit television (CCTV) cameras installed there.

A deadline of March 1 has been set by a religious group for Ahmadis to remove the CCTV cameras from around their worship place in E-block of Satellite Town, although the cameras had actually been placed there by the police to enhance security for the threatened community.

In a similar incident last month, hundreds of people surrounded the same worship centre demanding the removal of barriers around it, although they had been placed with the permission from the city government and the neighbours claimed to have had no problems with them.

Talking to The Express Tribune, a representative of the Ahmadi community said that a large number of locals gathered outside the location after Friday prayers and removed the security cameras. “I got shocked to see hundreds of people including local traders coming here at around 2pm and trying to remove the cameras. The police did not even try to stop them,” said the dejected representative.

New Town Police Station House Officer (SHO) Raja Abdul Qayum confirmed that over 200 protesters assembled outside the worship place and “asked” the authorities to remove the barricades.

“On the direction of the commissioner, we have removed CCTV cameras and barricades from outside the worship place, and no untoward incident happened there,” he said.

Leading the locals, businessman Sharjeel Mir claimed that the centre’s administration had been told a few weeks ago that their demands, including no more than 10 people at the worship centre at any time and removal of all security installations near the centre including cameras, would be fulfilled however nothing was done.

Subsequently, “protests were held against them and the major demand of locals is their removal from the locality” Mir insisted.

Repeated attempts were made to contact Rawalpindi Commissioner Zahid Saeed, but he was not available for comment.

Police inaction

In a statement, Ahmadiyya Community spokesperson Saleemuddin blamed the Rawalpindi police for the incident. He said that after the Lahore massacre of May 28, 2010, the community took certain security measures on the advice of law enforcement agencies. The measures included placement of barricades, barbed wires fencing on the walls and installation of CCTV cameras, to avoid a possible terrorist attack.

In a statement issued on Friday, Saleemuddin pointed out that the barricades had been removed earlier, and the “Ahmadiyya Centre has thus been deprived of eyes to keep watch on the approach roads. The community’s right of prayers and congregation has thus been exposed to grave danger.”

“On Friday, the police were present as usual. Sharjeel Mir was present on the street and watched worshipers leaving the place. After the peaceful dispersal of the congregation, finding no other excuse, the troublemaker [Shirjeel Mir] and some madrassa students came outside the centre and started shouting and raising slogans demanding the removal of the security cameras,” the statement added.

It alleged that the police, including the SHO present, made no attempt to stop them. “From 2:30 to 3:30pm, a crowd was allowed to gather in front of the community centre’s gate. Even the SSP did not order the unlawful assembly to disperse once he reached the site.

At about 3:30pm, the SSP asked the administration to remove the cameras to appease the mob. The SSP was informed that the measures had been adopted on the direction of the authorities and could only be removed on a written order from the district administration, the statement presented.

At about 4pm, the additional deputy commissioner (ADC) arrived and the police, under the supervision of the SSP removed the cameras although “no written order was produced”.

“The police was responsible for law and order and SSP had done it on his discretion. The SSP professed that he had done so to appease the mob so that they may disperse”, said the statement.

The JA spokesperson regretted that “cameras were removed but the mob was not asked to disperse. Instead, loudspeakers came in and provocative and threatening speeches were made. The mob was allowed to carry on with provocation and threats to demolish the centre.”


We are using cookies to give you the best experience. You can find out more about which cookies we are using or switch them off in privacy settings.
AcceptPrivacy Settings


This Cookie Policy explains how Ahmadiyya Muslim Association UK (AMA UK)  Limited (“company”, “we”, “us”, and “ours”) use cookies and similar technologies to recognize you when you visit our websites, including without limitation www.ahmadiyyauk.org and its mobile or localized versions and related domains / sub-domains (“Websites”) and/or our mobile application (“App”). It explains what these technologies are and why we use them, as well as your rights to control our use of them.

What are cookies?

Cookies are text files containing small amounts of information which are downloaded to your computer or mobile device when you visit a website or mobile application. Cookies are then sent back to the originating site on each subsequent visit, or to another site that recognizes that cookies. You can find out more information about cookies at www.allaboutcookies.org.

Cookies are widely used in order to make sites work or to work more efficiently.

We use cookies to enhance the online experience of our visitors (for example, by remembering your visits and/or page preferences) and to better understand how our site is used. Cookies may tell us, for example, whether you have visited our site before or whether you are a new visitor.

Cookies can remain on your computer or mobile device for different periods of time. Some cookies are ‘session cookies’, meaning that they exist only while your browser is open. These are deleted automatically once you close your browser. Other cookies are ‘permanent cookies,’ meaning that they survive after your browser is closed. They can be used by the site to recognize your computer or mobile device when you open your browser and browse the Internet again.

Why do we use cookies?

We use cookies for several reasons. Some cookies are required for technical reasons in order for our Websites and/or App to operate, and we refer to these as “essential” or “strictly necessary” cookies. Other cookies also enable us to track and target the interests of our users to enhance the experience on our Websites and/or App. Third parties serve cookies through our Websites and/or App for analytics and other purposes such as Google Analytics. In particular, we use forms related cookies which when you submit data through a form such as those found on contact pages or comment forms cookies may be set to remember your user details for future correspondence.

How can you control cookies?

You have the right to choose whether or not to accept cookies and we have explained how you can exercise this right below. However, please note that if you do not accept our cookies, you may experience some inconvenience in your use of our site.

You can set or amend your web browser controls to accept or refuse cookies. As the means by which you can refuse cookies through your web browser controls vary from browser-to-browser, you should visit your browser’s help menu for more information.

How often will we update this Cookie Policy?

We may update this Cookie Policy from time to time in order to reflect, for example, changes to the cookies we use or for other operational, legal or regulatory reasons. Please, therefore, re-visit this Cookie Policy regularly to stay informed about our use of cookies and related technologies.