Pakistan Encroaches On International Ahmadi Web Site Content

(ANALYSIS) In February, the Pakistan Telecommunication Agency blocked online access to Wikipedia in all of Pakistan for “sacrilegious content.” A few days later, officials reversed the decision, claiming that the benefits of Wikipedia outweighed the benefit caused by banning it entirely in order to restrict only a number of pages.

The PTA never stated which Wikipedia entries or pages contained the blasphemous content. However, in December 2020, the PTA had issued a notice to Wikipedia for “sacrilegious content,” particularly content that referred to Mirza Masroor Ahmad, the current leader of the Ahmadiyya Muslim community, as a Muslim.

Since 2008, the PTA has repeatedly banned or taken steps to ban online Ahmadi content inside Pakistan. However, the PTA has now extended its efforts to block or remove content that is hosted outside of Pakistan in the U.S., U.K., Australia, Singapore and Switzerland.

Amjad Mahmood Khan, spokesperson for the Ahmadiyya Muslim Community, believes that PTA’s attempts to block content outside of Pakistan are alarming.

“(The PTA is attempting) to export its discriminatory blasphemy laws against foreign citizens, which include U.S. citizens, and citizens from many other countries,” he said. “If this is left unchecked, then it could create a situation where Pakistan … will continue to seek to prosecute individuals like Ahmadi Muslims living abroad. The exportation of what is effectively a global blasphemy effort is disturbing.”

Ahmadi Muslims, or collectively the Ahmadiyya, comprise a sect of Islam founded by Mirza Ghulam Ahmad in 1889. Ahmad claimed to be the Messiah, or Mahdi, whom the Prophet Muhammad prophesied would revive, reform and peacefully restore Islam. 

According to the Muslim doctrine of “khatuman-nabiyeen,” or Seal of the Prophets, the majority of Muslims believe that the Prophet Muhammad was the final prophet. Because Ahmadis believe that Mirza Ghulam Ahmad himself was a subordinate prophet to Prophet Muhammad, other Muslims view Ahmadi beliefs as blasphemous. For their part, Ahmadis contend they believe that Prophet Muhammad was the Seal of the Prophets.

As a result, Ahmadis are persecuted by other Muslims around the world, but particularly in Pakistan. The Pakistani Islamist group Khatme-Nubbawat’s main goal is to promulgate the absolute finality of the Prophet Muhammad, which directly conflicts with the Ahmadi belief that its founder was a subordinate prophet. According to Khan, Pakistan is the only nation to define who is a Muslim at the constitutional level. Even to apply for a passport as a Muslim requires one to affirm that Mirza Ghulam Ahmad is a false prophet.

On Dec. 24, 2020, the PTA issued a legal notice against U.S. citizens Amjad Khan and Harris Zafar regarding, the U.S. Ahmadiyya community’s website hosted in the U.S. The notice stated that because Ahmadis are not allowed to represent themselves as Muslims or to disseminate their beliefs under Pakistan’s constitution, the PTA could demand the removal or blocking of the website under Pakistan’s 2016 Prevention of Electronic Crimes Act.

The notice stated that failing to abide by the PTA’s directive could result in a fine of 500 million Pakistani rupees, or $3.1 million USD, according to the exchange rate at that time.

Later correspondence from the PTA clarified that it was banning the website within the jurisdiction of Pakistan only. However, Section 1(4) of the Electronic Crimes Act, cited in the same correspondence, states that it regulates “any act committed outside Pakistan by any person if the act constitutes an offence under the Act and affects a person, property, information system or data located in Pakistan.”

According to attorney Monsura Sirajee of O’Melveny & Myers LLP, representing, “our repeated requests to the PTA to confirm that it is not seeking a remedy beyond geofencing the website in Pakistan (not only including a complete takedown but also criminal liability and hefty civil sanctions) have gone unanswered.” She explained that the criminal charges could result in imprisonment up to 10 years.

Sirajee said that on Dec. 30, 2020, a chief justice of the Lahore High Court issued arrest warrants for anyone outside of Pakistan who publishes online content that is deemed blasphemous. She pointed out that Section 298-B of the Pakistan Penal Code criminalizes identifying oneself as an Ahmadi Muslim.

On Dec. 25, 2020, the PTA issued a press release, the same one regarding Wikipedia content, reporting it had directed Google to remove “misleading search results associated with the ‘Present Khalifa of Islam’” as well as remove a Quran app published on the Google Play Store by the Ahmadiyya Muslim Community within Pakistan.

The community had first published a Quran app on the Play Store years prior. Google notified it of a request from the PTA to remove it in September 2018. While Khan says that Google had at first left the app available upon the community’s request, Google removed it without warning in October 2019 from Pakistan’s Play Store.

In May 2020, the community released a second Quran app, to which the December. 25, 2020, notice referred. Google complied again with the PTA’s request to remove the app on Dec. 27, 2020.

While the removal of both apps only affected Pakistan’s Play Store, Khan says that Google’s search results previously would generate a featured snippet that would list Mirza Masroor Ahmad as the current caliph of Islam when searching for the “the present caliph of Islam.” It appears that Google acquiesced to the PTA by removing the snippet also, and not just for Pakistan but on a greater transnational scale according to screenshots provided by Khan that were taken of the search results in the U.S.

On Dec. 30, 2020, according to an article in Dawn, a Lahore High Court chief justice inquired about what action Pakistan’s Federal Investigative Agency could take against someone outside Pakistan spreading blasphemous content, including registering a case against Google.

Additionally in December 2020, the PTA sent notices to the web distributor for Ahmadi websites,,, and, all hosted in the U.K.

One of those notices, sent in an email dated Dec. 27, 2020, from a PTA employee, stated that because the content was hosted outside the country, “they are available throughout the country beside blocking restrictions imposed by PTA.” It instructed the owners to “take immediate necessary measures so that these are not served in the country.”

Ultimately, the PTA stated it had removed access to within Pakistan in a Jan. 22, 2021, press release.

Throughout 2021, the PTA continued to send notices to 24 additional Ahmadiyya websites, including,,,,,,,,, and in the U.K.; in Australia; and in Canada; in Australia; in Singapore; in Switzerland and and in the U.S.

All of those websites were eventually blocked by the PTA within Pakistan.

As recently as June 2022, the PTA decided to block the website in Pakistan.

According to Khan, unlike Google and Apple, which have acquiesced to the PTA’s requests, Twitter and Wikimedia, the parent company of Wikipedia, have not removed Ahmadiyya content. He said that Twitter sent notices informing Ahmadiyya-related account owners that requests have been made to remove their content but has not taken the requested actions as far as he knows.

Likewise, Wikimedia has continued to host Ahmadi content.

But for Harris Zafar, national spokesperson for Ahmadiyya Press USA, tech companies’ compliance is only worsening the persecution against Ahmadis. “Big tech companies have actually fanned the flames of persecution by acquiescing to Pakistan’s demands,” he said.

Khan understands that tech companies do not want to lose access to countries with millions of users over so-called “domestic issues.” However, he says that “if you truly are benefiting from free speech, and making so much money off of robust proliferation of speech, why would you selectively restrict it when it comes to the free speech of communities that are being targeted by the government? … By doing so, tech companies are unfortunately complicit in their repression.”

He points out that virulent videos calling for the killing of Ahmadis remain on YouTube while videos of peace-loving Ahmadis are removed because they are “offensive.”

“The people who should be protected are the people who are being persecuted,” Khan said.

But Khan says that Pakistan attempting to define who is or is not a Muslim is “the single greatest threat to a unified Muslim community. No Muslim has the right to define the inner convictions … of someone’s heart.”

While any change to how other Muslims view Ahmadis will take a generational shift and acknowledgement of Ahmadis as Muslims from a constitutional approach, Khan says, “We will continue to courageously fight against religious repression wherever it is, to whoever it is, because our faith commands it. Islam stands for religious freedom for all.”

Original post can be read HERE.

We are using cookies to give you the best experience. You can find out more about which cookies we are using or switch them off in privacy settings.
AcceptPrivacy Settings


This Cookie Policy explains how Ahmadiyya Muslim Association UK (AMA UK)  Limited (“company”, “we”, “us”, and “ours”) use cookies and similar technologies to recognize you when you visit our websites, including without limitation and its mobile or localized versions and related domains / sub-domains (“Websites”) and/or our mobile application (“App”). It explains what these technologies are and why we use them, as well as your rights to control our use of them.

What are cookies?

Cookies are text files containing small amounts of information which are downloaded to your computer or mobile device when you visit a website or mobile application. Cookies are then sent back to the originating site on each subsequent visit, or to another site that recognizes that cookies. You can find out more information about cookies at

Cookies are widely used in order to make sites work or to work more efficiently.

We use cookies to enhance the online experience of our visitors (for example, by remembering your visits and/or page preferences) and to better understand how our site is used. Cookies may tell us, for example, whether you have visited our site before or whether you are a new visitor.

Cookies can remain on your computer or mobile device for different periods of time. Some cookies are ‘session cookies’, meaning that they exist only while your browser is open. These are deleted automatically once you close your browser. Other cookies are ‘permanent cookies,’ meaning that they survive after your browser is closed. They can be used by the site to recognize your computer or mobile device when you open your browser and browse the Internet again.

Why do we use cookies?

We use cookies for several reasons. Some cookies are required for technical reasons in order for our Websites and/or App to operate, and we refer to these as “essential” or “strictly necessary” cookies. Other cookies also enable us to track and target the interests of our users to enhance the experience on our Websites and/or App. Third parties serve cookies through our Websites and/or App for analytics and other purposes such as Google Analytics. In particular, we use forms related cookies which when you submit data through a form such as those found on contact pages or comment forms cookies may be set to remember your user details for future correspondence.

How can you control cookies?

You have the right to choose whether or not to accept cookies and we have explained how you can exercise this right below. However, please note that if you do not accept our cookies, you may experience some inconvenience in your use of our site.

You can set or amend your web browser controls to accept or refuse cookies. As the means by which you can refuse cookies through your web browser controls vary from browser-to-browser, you should visit your browser’s help menu for more information.

How often will we update this Cookie Policy?

We may update this Cookie Policy from time to time in order to reflect, for example, changes to the cookies we use or for other operational, legal or regulatory reasons. Please, therefore, re-visit this Cookie Policy regularly to stay informed about our use of cookies and related technologies.