Pakistan’s Religious Right Mobilizes Anew to Defend Blasphemy Laws

A strange new shrine has appeared on the eastern edge of Islamabad, Pakistan’s capital, amid the low hills that roll towards the Himalayan mountains.

Within a small gazebo, crowned by a green dome, there is a grave, decorated with silver tinsel and surrounded by flowers and richly patterned red carpets.

Inside lies the body of Mumtaz Qadri, a former policeman whose recent hanging for murder suddenly galvanized the mass forces of Pakistan’s religious right into a fresh, potentially destabilizing, confrontation with the state.

People “come here to sing hymns, and to recite the Holy Quran and verses for the departed soul,” said Raja Nafees Ahmed, Qadri’s father-in-law, as a group of men sat cross-legged around the grave, praying quietly.

Big colorful banners bearing Qadri’s picture flap in the warm breeze. These include images of the vast crowd — an estimated 30,000 plus — who turned out to honor the killer at his funeral a month ago.

Last Sunday, Qadri’s supporters were on the streets again. What started as a chehlum remembrance — officially, the 40th day of mourning, though the organizers brought the date forward — turned into a mass march on Islamabad.

The police blocked the roads with giant shipping containers, yet this failed to prevent thousands of men from reaching the city center, including the high-security “red zone” containing the key institutions of government.

Some ran amok, wrecking a Metrobus station and torching vehicles. About 2,000 of them began a sit-in outside parliament. In an apparent effort to deter further unrest, the authorities shut down much of Islamabad’s mobile phone network, to the annoyance of many of its 2 million or so residents.

For several days, the center of the capital echoed to the chant of “Mumtaz Qadri! Mumtaz Qadri! Symbol of courage and bravery! Mumtaz Qadri!” and “Mumtaz Qadri! Your lovers or devotees are numerous, numerous!”

Qadri was convicted under anti-terrorism laws because, in 2011, he shot dead the governor of Pakistan’s Punjab province, a widely-admired progressive politician and businessman, Salmaan Taseer, for whom Qadri worked as a bodyguard. Qadri committed this crime because Taseer had spoken out against Pakistan’s blasphemy laws, which carry the death penalty.

These laws have long been the source of deep concern to international rights organizations and others, not least because they are sometimes misused to settle feuds, grab land, or persecute religious minorities by making false allegations.

A gazebo shrine houses Mumtaz Qadri's body near Islamabad.

A gazebo shrine houses Mumtaz Qadri’s body near Islamabad.

There was a worldwide outcry when a Christian woman, Asia Bibi, was sentenced to death in 2010 on the word of a co-worker. Bibi remains the only woman on Pakistan’s death row over a blasphemy allegation — a charge she denies.

The men who took part in the sit-in outside parliament are Barelvi Muslims, a branch of Islam followed by a large proportion of Pakistan’s 190 million people. Barelvis are often loosely characterized as “moderate” in their faith, which is entwined with Sufi mysticism and ancient South Asian folk practices.

They tend to view the rival Saudi Arabian-nurtured ultra-conservative Deobandi school as hardline.

Yet many Barelvis are not “moderate” on the issue of blasphemy laws.

“For this, we will sacrifice our lives, our parents and our wives and our children,” said Mohammad Javed Iqbal, one of the protesters.

The sit-in was to press several demands, one of the organizers, Mohammed Younis Qadri, told NPR. They included assurances that there will be no change to Pakistan’s blasphemy laws, and that Asia Bibi, the Christian woman, will be executed.

After lengthy negotiations with government officials, the protest came to an end on Wednesday. Attention is now focusing on what kind of deal might have been made to secure the departure of the 2,000 protesters. Until then, fearful of attracting official accusations of fanning extremism, Pakistan’s media had greatly underplayed the story. But editorial writers weighed in, once it emerged that a deal may have been struck.

“Surrender by the state has never looked more tawdry and dismal,” said an editorial Friday in the English-language Dawn newspaper. The paper reported that, according to protest leaders, Pakistan’s government had “agreed not to review the blasphemy laws – thereby abandoning its legislative prerogative – and to review anti-terrorism watch lists – thereby giving up its executive prerogative.”

The Express Tribune also struck a critical note: “In essence the protesters got what they wanted from a government too weak to effectively confront them and terrified of the national consequences if it did,” said the editorial on Friday.

The issue is of particular concern to supporters of Asia Bibi. Her case “should be settled by the courts, not by mullahs,” said Joseph Francis of the Centre for Legal Aid, Assistance and Settlement, who is campaigning for Bibi’s conviction to be overturned.

Progressive Pakistanis have watched events unfold in Islamabad with considerable alarm. Talat Masood, a leading political commentator and retired general, described the Barelvis’ protest as “fanaticism … and misguided thinking.”

He is troubled by the hero-worship of Mumtaz Qadri: “Instead of condemning him as a murderer and a militant, he has been turned into a semi-prophet, and his grave is like a monument.”

Yet open discussion of the blasphemy laws will remain extremely difficult in Pakistan because of the deadly response it can draw from religious extremists.

“People are scared,” said Masood. “They don’t want to get into this. They think that it is for the state to take responsibility. But the state, for the same reason as individuals, tries to avoid it. I think the state, civil society, the media, the judiciary – everyone – has to play a role in order to try to reverse this.”

Masood believes that means debating this issue “absolutely without fear.” He adds: “The state must provide protection to those who speak openly, and who try to clarify what Islam stands for.”

www.npr.org/sections/parallels/2016/04/02/472660945/pakistans-religious-right-paralyzes-capital-defends-blasphemy-laws

We are using cookies to give you the best experience. You can find out more about which cookies we are using or switch them off in privacy settings.
AcceptPrivacy Settings

GDPR

This Cookie Policy explains how Ahmadiyya Muslim Association UK (AMA UK)  Limited (“company”, “we”, “us”, and “ours”) use cookies and similar technologies to recognize you when you visit our websites, including without limitation www.ahmadiyyauk.org and its mobile or localized versions and related domains / sub-domains (“Websites”) and/or our mobile application (“App”). It explains what these technologies are and why we use them, as well as your rights to control our use of them.

What are cookies?

Cookies are text files containing small amounts of information which are downloaded to your computer or mobile device when you visit a website or mobile application. Cookies are then sent back to the originating site on each subsequent visit, or to another site that recognizes that cookies. You can find out more information about cookies at www.allaboutcookies.org.

Cookies are widely used in order to make sites work or to work more efficiently.

We use cookies to enhance the online experience of our visitors (for example, by remembering your visits and/or page preferences) and to better understand how our site is used. Cookies may tell us, for example, whether you have visited our site before or whether you are a new visitor.

Cookies can remain on your computer or mobile device for different periods of time. Some cookies are ‘session cookies’, meaning that they exist only while your browser is open. These are deleted automatically once you close your browser. Other cookies are ‘permanent cookies,’ meaning that they survive after your browser is closed. They can be used by the site to recognize your computer or mobile device when you open your browser and browse the Internet again.

Why do we use cookies?

We use cookies for several reasons. Some cookies are required for technical reasons in order for our Websites and/or App to operate, and we refer to these as “essential” or “strictly necessary” cookies. Other cookies also enable us to track and target the interests of our users to enhance the experience on our Websites and/or App. Third parties serve cookies through our Websites and/or App for analytics and other purposes such as Google Analytics. In particular, we use forms related cookies which when you submit data through a form such as those found on contact pages or comment forms cookies may be set to remember your user details for future correspondence.

How can you control cookies?

You have the right to choose whether or not to accept cookies and we have explained how you can exercise this right below. However, please note that if you do not accept our cookies, you may experience some inconvenience in your use of our site.

You can set or amend your web browser controls to accept or refuse cookies. As the means by which you can refuse cookies through your web browser controls vary from browser-to-browser, you should visit your browser’s help menu for more information.

How often will we update this Cookie Policy?

We may update this Cookie Policy from time to time in order to reflect, for example, changes to the cookies we use or for other operational, legal or regulatory reasons. Please, therefore, re-visit this Cookie Policy regularly to stay informed about our use of cookies and related technologies.