The Muslims being hounded by Islamic zealots

Ahmadi Muslims are among the primary targets of the war on ‘blasphemy’.

Politicians and pundits rarely miss an opportunity to talk up the need to combat anti-Muslim prejudice in the UK. Indeed, all Britain’s major political parties (apart from the Tories) have even adopted the questionable definition of ‘Islamophobia’ formulated by the All Party Parliamentary Group (APPG) on British Muslims in 2019 – namely, that it is ‘a type of racism that targets expressions of Muslimness or perceived Muslimness’.

Yet while there is a lot of focus on non-Muslims’ prejudice against the so-called Muslim community, there is very little acknowledgement of certain Muslim sects’ prejudice against other Muslims. In particular, there is a wilful ignorance of the prejudice directed towards Ahmadi Muslims by other Muslims.

Numbering some 12million worldwide, Ahmadi Muslims constitute a comparatively small Islamic movement. It was founded in British India in the 19th century by Mirza Ghulam Ahmad, whom Ahamadi Muslims regard as a prophet.

Ahmad’s prophet status in the Ahmadiyya movement sets the sect apart from other Muslims. Most Muslim sects regard Muhammad as Islam’s final prophet. So for the Ahmadiyya movement to view Ahmad as a prophet is considered blasphemous.

The persecution of Ahmadi Muslims had, until relatively recently, been confined to Pakistan. There, they have been legally deemed ‘non-Muslims’ since 1974, and are banned from practising their religion in public. As a result of persecution at the hands of the Pakistani state, many Ahmadi Muslims have left Pakistan in recent decades to seek out a new life for themselves in the West. However, the Khatme Nubuwwat movement, a network of anti-Ahmadiyya organisations, has become increasingly influential in the West. As radical Pakistani clerics preach their contempt for Ahmadi Muslims both online and at international conferences, these refugees are no longer safe in the diaspora, either.

This was brought home in March 2016, when Bradford taxi driver Tanveer Ahmed drove 200 miles to Glasgow to stab and stomp Asad Shah, a shopkeeper, to death. Shah was an Ahmadi Muslim who had publicly ruminated on his faith on social media. Shah’s killing was celebrated by a Khatme Nubuwwat social-media account. Ahmed himself was later praised by extremist religious scholars in Pakistan for killing a ‘blasphemer’. Ahmed later posted videos to YouTube, recorded on a phone in Glasgow’s Barlinnie prison, urging fanatics to slaughter more followers of the Ahmadiyya sect. ‘Cut off their heads, cut off their heads, cut off their heads’, he told his fellow zealots.

Shah’s murder was shocking enough. But the response from representatives of other Muslim sects was even more so. Weeks after the killing in 2016, the Ahmadiyya community launched a ‘United Against Extremism’ campaign in Scotland. It was attended by members of the Sikh, Jewish and Christian communities. But representatives from the Muslim Council of Scotland (MCS) and Glasgow Central Mosque declined their invitations ‘at the last minute’. The MCS denounced the murder, but stated that nobody should be ‘forced to accept the Ahmadi Muslims as part of the wider Muslim community’.

The callous, intolerant response of the MCS and the Glasgow Central Mosque exposes the extent of anti-Ahmadi prejudice. But it shouldn’t have surprised anyone. A BBC investigation in 2016 claimed that Sabir Ali, head of religious events at Glasgow Central Mosque, was also president of Sipah-e-Sahaba, a militant Sunni-Islamist organisation responsible for sectarian attacks against Shia Muslims and Ahmadiyya minorities in Pakistan.

Anti-Ahmadiyya prejudice is more common in Britain than many are prepared to admit. In 2010, Suliman Gani, then the imam of the Tooting Islamic Centre, organised a boycott of Ahmadi businesses, calling them ‘Qadiani’, a pejorative term referring to Ahmadi Muslims. In 2016, the Charity Commission was forced to investigate Stockwell Green Mosque, after piles of flyers were found there asserting that Ahmadi Muslims should face death if they refuse to convert to mainstream Islam. Indeed, so fearful are members of Britain’s Ahmadiyya community that some have had to implement airport-style security arrangements at their mosques.

This ‘phobia’ towards Ahmadi Muslims is also present within public-facing Muslim organisations. In her 2019 reportChallenging Hateful Extremism, Sara Khan, the former commissioner for countering extremism, reported that Ahmadi Muslims had been barred from taking a seat on a local Standing Council on Religious Education (SACRE) after other Muslim representatives threatened to withdraw.

Prejudice against this already persecuted Muslim sect is clearly a growing problem in the UK. Yet our political and media elites seem to be steadfastly ignoring it. Indeed, Quilliam, the now defunct Muslim counter-extremism think-tank, partially rejected the APPG definition of ‘Islamophobia’ precisely because of its failure to address ‘intra-faith’ Islamophobia. As it put it at the time: ‘A definition which does not protect minority Muslim groups from attacks which – were they directed by non-Muslims – would be regarded as Islamophobia, is not fit for the purposes of our society.’ Yet most of the main UK political parties adopted the definition anyway.

The double standards are shocking. While politicians and commentators posture over Islamophobia, they turn a blind eye to what we might call Ahmadi-phobia among Muslims, even though this prejudice has already proven to be deadly. This intolerance towards so-called blasphemers poses a significant challenge to our liberal, secular society. We need to start taking it seriously.

The original post can be read HERE.

We are using cookies to give you the best experience. You can find out more about which cookies we are using or switch them off in privacy settings.
AcceptPrivacy Settings

GDPR

This Cookie Policy explains how Ahmadiyya Muslim Association UK (AMA UK)  Limited (“company”, “we”, “us”, and “ours”) use cookies and similar technologies to recognize you when you visit our websites, including without limitation www.ahmadiyyauk.org and its mobile or localized versions and related domains / sub-domains (“Websites”) and/or our mobile application (“App”). It explains what these technologies are and why we use them, as well as your rights to control our use of them.

What are cookies?

Cookies are text files containing small amounts of information which are downloaded to your computer or mobile device when you visit a website or mobile application. Cookies are then sent back to the originating site on each subsequent visit, or to another site that recognizes that cookies. You can find out more information about cookies at www.allaboutcookies.org.

Cookies are widely used in order to make sites work or to work more efficiently.

We use cookies to enhance the online experience of our visitors (for example, by remembering your visits and/or page preferences) and to better understand how our site is used. Cookies may tell us, for example, whether you have visited our site before or whether you are a new visitor.

Cookies can remain on your computer or mobile device for different periods of time. Some cookies are ‘session cookies’, meaning that they exist only while your browser is open. These are deleted automatically once you close your browser. Other cookies are ‘permanent cookies,’ meaning that they survive after your browser is closed. They can be used by the site to recognize your computer or mobile device when you open your browser and browse the Internet again.

Why do we use cookies?

We use cookies for several reasons. Some cookies are required for technical reasons in order for our Websites and/or App to operate, and we refer to these as “essential” or “strictly necessary” cookies. Other cookies also enable us to track and target the interests of our users to enhance the experience on our Websites and/or App. Third parties serve cookies through our Websites and/or App for analytics and other purposes such as Google Analytics. In particular, we use forms related cookies which when you submit data through a form such as those found on contact pages or comment forms cookies may be set to remember your user details for future correspondence.

How can you control cookies?

You have the right to choose whether or not to accept cookies and we have explained how you can exercise this right below. However, please note that if you do not accept our cookies, you may experience some inconvenience in your use of our site.

You can set or amend your web browser controls to accept or refuse cookies. As the means by which you can refuse cookies through your web browser controls vary from browser-to-browser, you should visit your browser’s help menu for more information.

How often will we update this Cookie Policy?

We may update this Cookie Policy from time to time in order to reflect, for example, changes to the cookies we use or for other operational, legal or regulatory reasons. Please, therefore, re-visit this Cookie Policy regularly to stay informed about our use of cookies and related technologies.